Pandolfi v. City of Cleveland

186 N.E. 92, 126 Ohio St. 430, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 430, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 418
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 29, 1933
Docket23749
StatusPublished

This text of 186 N.E. 92 (Pandolfi v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pandolfi v. City of Cleveland, 186 N.E. 92, 126 Ohio St. 430, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 430, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 418 (Ohio 1933).

Opinion

It appearing that two members of the court did not participate herein and that a majority of the court does not agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals. v

Judgment affirmed.

Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., and Kinkade, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 N.E. 92, 126 Ohio St. 430, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 430, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pandolfi-v-city-of-cleveland-ohio-1933.