Pandjiris v. McQueen

New York Supreme Court

Pandjiris v. McQueen

13 N.Y.S. 705, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 602, 59 Hun 625, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1648

DecidedMarch 13, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 13 N.Y.S. 705 (Pandjiris v. McQueen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pandjiris v. McQueen, 13 N.Y.S. 705, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 602, 59 Hun 625, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1648 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinions

Van Brunt, P. J.

We have examined the record in the case at bar, and see no reason to differ from the conclusion arrived at by the judge at the special term. None of the objections presented upon the record are well taken, and we do not think it necessary to refer to them in detail, because the counsel for the appellant has not considered the question of sufficient importance to refer in his points to the correct folios in the case affecting the same, but reference is made to folios in some'imaginary ease which is not before the court. The order should be affirmed,' with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Brunt, P. J.

We have examined the record in the case at bar, and see no reason to differ from the conclusion arrived at by the judge at the special term. None of the objections presented upon the record are well taken, and we do not think it necessary to refer to them in detail, because the counsel for the appellant has not considered the question of sufficient importance to refer in his points to the correct folios in the case affecting the same, but reference is made to folios in some'imaginary ease which is not before the court. The order should be affirmed,' with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 N.Y.S. 705, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 602, 59 Hun 625, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pandjiris-v-mcqueen-nysupct-1891.