Pancoast v. Barry
18 F. Cas. 1083, 1 Cranch 176
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided July 15, 1804·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
gave the instruction as prayed. It was admitted, that where a boundary is called for and proved, the course and distance must conform, although thereby it varies from the course and distance stated in the grant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pancoast v. Barry, 18 F. Cas. 1083, 1 Cranch 176 (circtddc 1804).
18 F. Cas. 1083 (Pancoast v. Barry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Jackson v. Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.
133 So. 195 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)
Orick v. State
105 So. 465 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1925)
Charles F. Champion, Appt. v. John C. Ames, United States Marshal
188 U.S. 321 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Edye v. Robertson
18 F. 135 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York, 1883)
United States v. Curtis
11 Abb. N. Cas. 1 (S.D. New York, 1882)
United States v. Wynn
9 F. 886 (E.D. Missouri, 1882)
Wilcox v. Saunders
4 Neb. 569 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1876)
Alston v. Rowles
13 Fla. 117 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1869)
Eakin v. Raub
12 Serg. & Rawle 330 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1825)