Panay Horizontal Show Jar Co. v. D. C. Jenkins Glass Co.
This text of 26 F.2d 1020 (Panay Horizontal Show Jar Co. v. D. C. Jenkins Glass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are of opinion that the District Court properly dismissed the bill for want of equity, but, upon the record, are not sufficiently satisfied of the invalidity of the claims in issue to justify our approval of the finding in the decree to that effect. We believe the prior art disclosure of the Browning patent, No. 1,017,379,1912, so far limits the claims in issue that appellee’s device escapes infringement.
The decree will be modified, by striking out the finding of invalidity and inserting a finding of noninfringement of the claims, and, as so modified, it is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F.2d 1020, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/panay-horizontal-show-jar-co-v-d-c-jenkins-glass-co-ca7-1928.