Panay Horizontal Show Jar Co. v. D. C. Jenkins Glass Co.

26 F.2d 1020, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3856
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMay 17, 1928
DocketNo. 3947
StatusPublished

This text of 26 F.2d 1020 (Panay Horizontal Show Jar Co. v. D. C. Jenkins Glass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Panay Horizontal Show Jar Co. v. D. C. Jenkins Glass Co., 26 F.2d 1020, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3856 (7th Cir. 1928).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are of opinion that the District Court properly dismissed the bill for want of equity, but, upon the record, are not sufficiently satisfied of the invalidity of the claims in issue to justify our approval of the finding in the decree to that effect. We believe the prior art disclosure of the Browning patent, No. 1,017,379,1912, so far limits the claims in issue that appellee’s device escapes infringement.

The decree will be modified, by striking out the finding of invalidity and inserting a finding of noninfringement of the claims, and, as so modified, it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F.2d 1020, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/panay-horizontal-show-jar-co-v-d-c-jenkins-glass-co-ca7-1928.