Panaro v. Faxton Hospital
This text of 91 A.D.2d 831 (Panaro v. Faxton Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s moving papers allege that counsel’s default in proceeding before the medical malprac[832]*832tice panel was occasioned by the press of other business. This constitutes nothing more than a law office failure and is insufficient to warrant relief (see Migliaccio v Phoenix Ins. Co., 91 AD2d 821; Beermont Corp. v Yager, 34 AD2d 589; see, also, Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594, 600). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, McLaughlin, J. — vacate order dismissing complaint.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.D.2d 831, 458 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/panaro-v-faxton-hospital-nyappdiv-1982.