Panaro v. Faxton Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Panaro v. Faxton Hospital

91 A.D.2d 831, 458 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19736

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 1982·Published

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s moving papers allege that counsel’s default in proceeding before the medical malprac[832]*832tice panel was occasioned by the press of other business. This constitutes nothing more than a law office failure and is insufficient to warrant relief (see Migliaccio v Phoenix Ins. Co., 91 AD2d 821; Beermont Corp. v Yager, 34 AD2d 589; see, also, Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594, 600). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, McLaughlin, J. — vacate order dismissing complaint.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s moving papers allege that counsel’s default in proceeding before the medical malprac[832]*832tice panel was occasioned by the press of other business. This constitutes nothing more than a law office failure and is insufficient to warrant relief (see Migliaccio v Phoenix Ins. Co., 91 AD2d 821; Beermont Corp. v Yager, 34 AD2d 589; see, also, Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594, 600). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, McLaughlin, J. — vacate order dismissing complaint.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Panaro v. Faxton Hospital, 91 A.D.2d 831, 458 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

91 A.D.2d 831 (Panaro v. Faxton Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related