Panamericana Promociones, S.A. v. Hoyos

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Panamericana Promociones, S.A. v. Hoyos

578 So. 2d 67, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3824, 1991 WL 65960

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 30, 1991

DocketNo. 90-1422

StatusPublished

This text of 578 So. 2d 67 (Panamericana Promociones, S.A. v. Hoyos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Panamericana Promociones, S.A. v. Hoyos, 578 So. 2d 67, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3824, 1991 WL 65960 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Panamericana Promociones, S.A., appeals an order granting a “Motion to Quash Purported Service of Process and/or Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over the Person of Ivan Hoyos.” We affirm the order granting the motion to quash service. Logan v. Mora, 555 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see Hanna v. Millbyer, 570 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Because appellant had not filed the return receipts as required by statute, an order quashing service was appropriate. Logan. However, this ruling is without prejudice to appellant perfecting service by any appropriate means, including (a) filing the return receipts, (b) effecting service by any approved method, or (c) renewing the showing of avoidance of service on a more complete record. Because the record demonstrates that the cause is still pending against Mr. Hoyos, we remand the case for further proceedings.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Panamericana Promociones, S.A., appeals an order granting a “Motion to Quash Purported Service of Process and/or Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over the Person of Ivan Hoyos.” We affirm the order granting the motion to quash service. Logan v. Mora, 555 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see Hanna v. Millbyer, 570 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Because appellant had not filed the return receipts as required by statute, an order quashing service was appropriate. Logan. However, this ruling is without prejudice to appellant perfecting service by any appropriate means, including (a) filing the return receipts, (b) effecting service by any approved method, or (c) renewing the showing of avoidance of service on a more complete record. Because the record demonstrates that the cause is still pending against Mr. Hoyos, we remand the case for further proceedings.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 So. 2d 67, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3824, 1991 WL 65960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/panamericana-promociones-sa-v-hoyos-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack