Panamerican Consulting Co. v. Broun

238 Md. 548
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided April 29, 1965·No. No. 261·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR REVISION OF OPINION

The motion of the Brouns for a reargument is denied. Nothing in the opinion filed herein is intended to be or is to be construed as an expression of opinion, pro or con, on the right of the Brouns to file an action for the rescission of the agreement of April 30, 1960, for the sale of their Panamerican stock and release of their claims as therein set forth, or for damages based on alleged fraud and misrepresentation in connection with the said sale and settlement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Panamerican Consulting Co. v. Broun, 238 Md. 548 (Md. 1965).

238 Md. 548 (Panamerican Consulting Co. v. Broun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Auslander v. Helfand
988 F. Supp. 576 (D. Maryland, 1997)
Globe American Casualty Co. v. Boo Hyun Chung
547 A.2d 654 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1988)