Panama Real Estate Co. v. Dime Savings Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Panama Real Estate Co. v. Dime Savings Bank

105 S.E. 444, 115 S.C. 290, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 229

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedDecember 20, 1920

Docket10540

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 105 S.E. 444 (Panama Real Estate Co. v. Dime Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Panama Real Estate Co. v. Dime Savings Bank, 105 S.E. 444, 115 S.C. 290, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 229 (S.C. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the. Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Prince, refusing to change the place of trial from Lexington county to Charleston county. The motion was based upon two grounds:

(1) Because Lexington county was not the proper county.

(2) Because the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change.

1, 2 The motion was refused, but the grounds upon which the refusal was based were not stated. If the refusal can be sustained on either ground, it must be sustained. The refusal on the second ground was clearly within his Honor’s discretion, and we do not see that he has abused his discretion.

The first ground need not be considered. See Moore v. Arthur, 113 S. C. 112, 101 S. E. 640.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Hydrick and Watts concur. Mr. Chiee Justice Gary and Mr. Justice Gage absent on account of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI