Panagopulos v. Manning Et Ux.
72 P.2d 456, 93 Utah 215, 1937 Utah LEXIS 51
Opinions
Plaintiff has filed a petition for a rehearing. We have carefully examined the matters therein presented and the authorities cited. All matters presented were by us considered on the original hearing and a further examination of them discloses no reason why the opinion of the court, Panagopulos v. Manning, 93 Utah 198, 69 P. (2d) 614, should be disturbed.
The petition for a rehearing is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Panagopulos v. Manning Et Ux., 72 P.2d 456, 93 Utah 215, 1937 Utah LEXIS 51 (Utah 1937).
72 P.2d 456 (Panagopulos v. Manning Et Ux.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompson v. Sloan
130 N.W.2d 256 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1964)