Pan v. State, Department of Health, Board of Acupuncture

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pan v. State, Department of Health, Board of Acupuncture

810 So. 2d 544, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1394, 2002 WL 215037

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 13, 2002

DocketNo. 3D01-1410

StatusPublished

This text of 810 So. 2d 544 (Pan v. State, Department of Health, Board of Acupuncture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pan v. State, Department of Health, Board of Acupuncture, 810 So. 2d 544, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1394, 2002 WL 215037 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order of the Board of Acupuncture revoking the appellant’s license to practice acupuncture where there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the same. See Section 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997); Department of Banking & Fin., Div. of Sec. & Investor Protection v. Osborne Stern and Co., 670 So.2d 932 (Fla.1996); Legal Envt’l Assistance Found., Inc. v. Clark, 668 So.2d 982, 987 (Fla.1996). Moreover, we find any claimed procedural error to be harmless. See Carter v. Dep’t. of Prof. Reg., Bd. of Optometry, 633 So.2d 3 (Fla.1994); Ong v. Dept. of Prof. Reg., Bd. of Dentistry, 565 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Gordon v. Savage, 383 So.2d 646 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order of the Board of Acupuncture revoking the appellant’s license to practice acupuncture where there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the same. See Section 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997); Department of Banking & Fin., Div. of Sec. & Investor Protection v. Osborne Stern and Co., 670 So.2d 932 (Fla.1996); Legal Envt’l Assistance Found., Inc. v. Clark, 668 So.2d 982, 987 (Fla.1996). Moreover, we find any claimed procedural error to be harmless. See Carter v. Dep’t. of Prof. Reg., Bd. of Optometry, 633 So.2d 3 (Fla.1994); Ong v. Dept. of Prof. Reg., Bd. of Dentistry, 565 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Gordon v. Savage, 383 So.2d 646 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

810 So. 2d 544, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1394, 2002 WL 215037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pan-v-state-department-of-health-board-of-acupuncture-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack