Pan v. State, Department of Health, Board of Acupuncture

810 So. 2d 544, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1394, 2002 WL 215037
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 2002·No. No. 3D01-1410·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order of the Board of Acupuncture revoking the appellant’s license to practice acupuncture where there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the same. See Section 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997); Department of Banking & Fin., Div. of Sec. & Investor Protection v. Osborne Stern and Co., 670 So.2d 932 (Fla.1996); Legal Envt’l Assistance Found., Inc. v. Clark, 668 So.2d 982, 987 (Fla.1996). Moreover, we find any claimed procedural error to be harmless. See Carter v. Dep’t. of Prof. Reg., Bd. of Optometry, 633 So.2d 3 (Fla.1994); Ong v. Dept. of Prof. Reg., Bd. of Dentistry, 565 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Gordon v. Savage, 383 So.2d 646 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pan v. State, Department of Health, Board of Acupuncture, 810 So. 2d 544, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1394, 2002 WL 215037 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

810 So. 2d 544 (Pan v. State, Department of Health, Board of Acupuncture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. Savage
383 So. 2d 646 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
DEPT. OF BANKING & FIN. v. Osborne Stern
670 So. 2d 932 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
LEAF v. Clark
668 So. 2d 982 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Carter v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION
633 So. 2d 3 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Ong v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION
565 So. 2d 1384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)