Pan Handle Coal Co. v. Decoursey

136 N.E. 577, 78 Ind. App. 580, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 146
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 12, 1922
DocketNo. 11,421
StatusPublished

This text of 136 N.E. 577 (Pan Handle Coal Co. v. Decoursey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pan Handle Coal Co. v. Decoursey, 136 N.E. 577, 78 Ind. App. 580, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 146 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Nichols, P. J.

— This is an appeal from the award of the full Industrial Board entered on February 28, 1922, [581]*581in a proceeding brought by appellee under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, (Acts 1915 p. 392, §80201 et seq. Burns’ Supp. 1921) in which appellee made claim for compensation on account of an injury to his eyes which was received June 16, 1920. The Industrial Board, by a majority of its members, made a finding that appellee had permanently lost one-half of the vision of his right eye and one-third of the vision of his left eye, and entered an award for compensation to appellee for 125 weeks at the rate of $13..20 per week. The Industrial Board’s finding was based upon evidence heard by it, the sufficiency of which to sustain the finding and award, is challenged by appellant. There was some evidence to sustain the Industrial Board’s finding, and its weight including the interpretation of certain expert evidence, was for the Industrial Board and the finding will not be disturbed by this court!

Appellant contends that the evidence shows a six per cent, loss of vision of one eye and five per cent, of the other, and that a correct result would nave been reached by adding six per cent, of 150 weeks or nine weeks to five per cent, of 150 weeks, or seven and a half weeks, making a total of sixteen and a half weeks as the compensation period. As neither party challenges this method of determining the compensation to be allowed, which seems to have been followed by the Industrial Board, based on a different per cent., however, we do not consider it in this opinion, but see, Lauritzen v. United States, etc., Co. (1922), ante 293, 135 N. E. 390.

The award is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lauritzen v. United States Reduction Co.
135 N.E. 390 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 N.E. 577, 78 Ind. App. 580, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pan-handle-coal-co-v-decoursey-indctapp-1922.