Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Victoria Travel Agency, Inc.

39 A.D.2d 692, 332 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 23, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 39 A.D.2d 692 (Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Victoria Travel Agency, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Victoria Travel Agency, Inc., 39 A.D.2d 692, 332 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered August 3,1971, granting the motion of defendant Patricio Suarez III to reconsider the prior decision of said court, and upon such reconsideration, modifying such prior decision to the extent of opening a default judgment against said defendant on condition that he file an undertaking in the amount of $40,000, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of deleting the requirement that appellant file an undertaking, and appellant’s motion is granted with the judgment and all future payments under the income garnishee, which are to be held in escrow by respondent’s attorney to abide the event, to stand as security. Except as hereby modified, the order appealed from is otherwise affirmed; and respondent shall recover of appellant $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Appellant shall serve his answer within 10 days after service upon him by respondent of a copy of the order entered hereon with notice of entry. Under the circumstances here presented, where the record discloses that appellant’s default was unintentional, it was improper to require, as a condition to opening such default, that appellant file a $40,000 undertaking. We believe it is sufficient that the default judgment and the income execution stand as security. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liberty Taxi Management, Inc. v. Gincherman
32 A.D.3d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Weinstein, Skoller & Kaye, P. C. v. Lynard Properties, Ltd.
79 A.D.2d 987 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Astrocom/Marlux, Inc. v. Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.
61 A.D.2d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Rawson v. Austin
49 A.D.2d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A.D.2d 692, 332 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pan-american-world-airways-inc-v-victoria-travel-agency-inc-nyappdiv-1972.