Pan American Bank of Orlando v. Orange County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pan American Bank of Orlando v. Orange County

460 So. 2d 1021, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 70, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16237

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 27, 1984

DocketNo. 84-1352

StatusPublished

This text of 460 So. 2d 1021 (Pan American Bank of Orlando v. Orange County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pan American Bank of Orlando v. Orange County, 460 So. 2d 1021, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 70, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16237 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari in this case to review a trial court order denying petitioner’s motion to compel discovery, is denied. See Industrial Tractor Company v. Bartlett, 454 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). See generally Haddad, The Common Law Writ of Certiorari in Florida, 29 U.Fla.L. Rev. 207, 224 (1977).

The underlying discovery question here sought to be presented by certiorari review of an interlocutory trial order, and which we do not now reach, is whether documents protected by the attorney-client privilege (see § 90.502(2), Fla.Stat.) are exempt from the disclosure requirements of the Public Records Act (see § 119.07(3)(a), Fla.Stat.). This interesting point of law can be presented on direct appeal in the event petitioner loses in the trial court and then desires review by appeal from the final judgment.

DENIED.

COBB, C.J., and COWART, J., concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari in this case to review a trial court order denying petitioner’s motion to compel discovery, is denied. See Industrial Tractor Company v. Bartlett, 454 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). See generally Haddad, The Common Law Writ of Certiorari in Florida, 29 U.Fla.L. Rev. 207, 224 (1977).

The underlying discovery question here sought to be presented by certiorari review of an interlocutory trial order, and which we do not now reach, is whether documents protected by the attorney-client privilege (see § 90.502(2), Fla.Stat.) are exempt from the disclosure requirements of the Public Records Act (see § 119.07(3)(a), Fla.Stat.). This interesting point of law can be presented on direct appeal in the event petitioner loses in the trial court and then desires review by appeal from the final judgment.

DENIED.

COBB, C.J., and COWART, J., concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

460 So. 2d 1021, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 70, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pan-american-bank-of-orlando-v-orange-county-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack