Pan-Alaska Fisheries, Inc. v. Kimbrell-Lawrence Transportation

Ninth Circuit

Pan-Alaska Fisheries, Inc. v. Kimbrell-Lawrence Transportation

451 F.2d 1389

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 7, 1972

Docket71-2400

StatusPublished

This text of 451 F.2d 1389 (Pan-Alaska Fisheries, Inc. v. Kimbrell-Lawrence Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pan-Alaska Fisheries, Inc. v. Kimbrell-Lawrence Transportation, 451 F.2d 1389 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

451 F.2d 1389

PAN-ALASKA FISHERIES, INC., a corporaton, Appellee,
v.
KIMBRELL-LAWRENCE TRANSPORTATION, INC., a corporation, d/b/a
Pioneer Alaska Line and M/V WESTERN PIONEER, her
engines, tackle, apparel, furniture and
equipment, Appellants.

No. 71-2400.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 7, 1972.

Raymond J. Petersen (argued), of Maxwell & Petersen, Seattle, Wash., for appellants.

Dwight L. Guy (argued), Martin P. Detels, Jr., of Detels, Draper & Marinkovich, Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The award of damages under the Carriage of Goods at Sea Act, 46 U.S.C. Sec. 1300 et seq., for damage to a shipment of frozen fancy King Crab is affirmed.

The burden of exculpation was on the carrier. The trial judge was not satisfied with any of the explanations of the carrier. On the record, he could properly so conclude.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

451 F.2d 1389

PAN-ALASKA FISHERIES, INC., a corporaton, Appellee,
v.
KIMBRELL-LAWRENCE TRANSPORTATION, INC., a corporation, d/b/a
Pioneer Alaska Line and M/V WESTERN PIONEER, her
engines, tackle, apparel, furniture and
equipment, Appellants.

No. 71-2400.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 7, 1972.

Raymond J. Petersen (argued), of Maxwell & Petersen, Seattle, Wash., for appellants.

Dwight L. Guy (argued), Martin P. Detels, Jr., of Detels, Draper & Marinkovich, Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The award of damages under the Carriage of Goods at Sea Act, 46 U.S.C. Sec. 1300 et seq., for damage to a shipment of frozen fancy King Crab is affirmed.

The burden of exculpation was on the carrier. The trial judge was not satisfied with any of the explanations of the carrier. On the record, he could properly so conclude.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

451 F.2d 1389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pan-alaska-fisheries-inc-v-kimbrell-lawrence-transportation-ca9-1972.