Pamrapau Corp. v. City of Bayonne
19 A.2d 877, 129 N.J. Eq. 586, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 674
Opinion
The order under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Kays.
For affirmance — -The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodinb, Donges, IIeher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pamrapau Corp. v. City of Bayonne, 19 A.2d 877, 129 N.J. Eq. 586, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 674 (N.J. 1941).
19 A.2d 877 (Pamrapau Corp. v. City of Bayonne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Tideland's License 96-0114-T
740 A.2d 1125 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)