Pamphile v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pamphile v. State

113 So. 3d 949, 2013 WL 461634, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1937

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 2013

DocketNo. 5D12-679

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 So. 3d 949 (Pamphile v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pamphile v. State, 113 So. 3d 949, 2013 WL 461634, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1937 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

See Williams v. State, 768 So.2d 1281, 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“Given the overwhelming evidence of guilt adduced by the state, we cannot find that the denial of the [950]*950appellant’s motion for a continuance during trial, in order to locate a defense witness, caused any material prejudice to the appellant particularly when it is unknown whether the witnesses’ testimony would have been favorable to the appellant.”).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

See Williams v. State, 768 So.2d 1281, 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“Given the overwhelming evidence of guilt adduced by the state, we cannot find that the denial of the [950]*950appellant’s motion for a continuance during trial, in order to locate a defense witness, caused any material prejudice to the appellant particularly when it is unknown whether the witnesses’ testimony would have been favorable to the appellant.”).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 So. 3d 949, 2013 WL 461634, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pamphile-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack