PAMELA STORMS vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of PAMELA STORMS vs STATE OF FLORIDA (PAMELA STORMS vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED PAMELA STORMS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D21-3007 LT Case Nos. 2019-CF-001224-A STATE OF FLORIDA, 2020-CF-001212-A 2021-CF-000912-A Appellee. ______________________________/
Opinion filed July 29, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
WOZNIAK, J. In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence.
However, the trial court’s Order on Motion to Correct Sentencing Error
reflects that, in case number 2021-CF-000912-A, the amount imposed for
“Prosecution/Investigative Costs” was to be corrected to $100 but, due to a
scrivener’s error, the corrected order mistakenly imposed $200. We remand
for correction of that order. See, e.g., Roberts v. State, 252 So. 3d 424, 424
(Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction
of scrivener’s error).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.
HARRIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PAMELA STORMS vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pamela-storms-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.