Pamela Richburg-Smith v. in Re: Keino Nkrumah, A/K/A Keino Smith
This text of Pamela Richburg-Smith v. in Re: Keino Nkrumah, A/K/A Keino Smith (Pamela Richburg-Smith v. in Re: Keino Nkrumah, A/K/A Keino Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 27, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-1973 Lower Tribunal No. 25-2649-CP-02 ________________
Pamela Richburg-Smith, Appellant,
vs.
In Re: Keino Nkrumah, a/k/a Keino Smith, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose Luis Fernandez , Judge.
Orville McKenzie, for appellant.
Glenn R. Miller, LLC, and Glenn R. Miller and James Randle, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Simpson v. Williamson, 611 So. 2d 544, 546 (Fla. 5th
DCA 1992) (agreeing that “the execution of a will may be valid, even though
a required witness signs in a capacity other than that of a witness”);
Helfenbein v. Baval, 157 So. 3d 531, 534 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (accepting
premise that notary could have served as required second witness to will
while reversing on other grounds).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pamela Richburg-Smith v. in Re: Keino Nkrumah, A/K/A Keino Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pamela-richburg-smith-v-in-re-keino-nkrumah-aka-keino-smith-fladistctapp-2026.