Pamela Ann Greaney v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 30, 2015·No. 14-15-00557-CR·Published

Opinion

Abatement Order filed July 30, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00557-CR

PAMELA ANN GREANEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1990802

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant challenges the trial court’s order denying her motion to suppress.

Although appellant requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, none have been filed. When the losing party on a motion to suppress requests findings of fact and conclusions of law, the trial court is required to make them. State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 698–99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress and have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this court by August 31, 2015.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pamela Ann Greaney v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pamela Ann Greaney v. State (Pamela Ann Greaney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cullen
195 S.W.3d 696 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)