Home/Circuit Court of North Carolina/Palyart v. Goulding

Palyart v. Goulding

18 F. Cas. 1067, 1 N.C. 78, 2 Mart. 78
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina·Decided June 15, 1792·Published

Opinion

But

Patterson, J.

took a distinction between the contract and remedy: and observed, that the contract remained the same notwithftanding this act: and that the remedy only was extended.

And Sitgreaves, J. accordante.

A respondeas ouster was awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palyart v. Goulding, 18 F. Cas. 1067, 1 N.C. 78, 2 Mart. 78 (circtnc 1792).

18 F. Cas. 1067 (Palyart v. Goulding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.