Palumbo v. Frank
This text of 58 A.D.2d 648 (Palumbo v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondent’s determination, dated February 26, 1976 and made after a hearing, which found petitioner guilty of two specifications and fined him a total of three days’ pay. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with $50 costs and disbursements. In our opinion substantial evidence was adduced at the departmental hearing to sustain findings that petitioner failed to make an hourly call over a departmental telephone, and also failed to acknowledge a radio call that a burglary was in progress, in violation of the department’s rules and regulations. Hopkins, J. P., Shapiro, Hawkins and Suozzi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 A.D.2d 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palumbo-v-frank-nyappdiv-1977.