Palumbo v. Atlas Portland Cement Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Palumbo v. Atlas Portland Cement Co.

120 N.Y.S. 739

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 120 N.Y.S. 739 (Palumbo v. Atlas Portland Cement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palumbo v. Atlas Portland Cement Co., 120 N.Y.S. 739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a former trial a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was set aside, and the order entered upon such ruling was affirmed without opinion (Appellate Term, May 27, 1909). The practical effect of such determination was that the truck in suit was owned and managed by an independent contractor and not by the defendant. [740]*740The evidence adduced upon the first trial was substantially the same, as that given upon the trial which is the subject of this review, and in the light of the determination so made upon the former appeal, in which determination we fully concur, the judgment cannot be allowed to stand.

The judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial are reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs.to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a former trial a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was set aside, and the order entered upon such ruling was affirmed without opinion (Appellate Term, May 27, 1909). The practical effect of such determination was that the truck in suit was owned and managed by an independent contractor and not by the defendant. [740]*740The evidence adduced upon the first trial was substantially the same, as that given upon the trial which is the subject of this review, and in the light of the determination so made upon the former appeal, in which determination we fully concur, the judgment cannot be allowed to stand.

The judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial are reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs.to the appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 N.Y.S. 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palumbo-v-atlas-portland-cement-co-nyappterm-1910.