Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company

164 N.E. 564, 249 N.Y. 511, 59 A.L.R. 1263, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 836
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 9, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 164 N.E. 564 (Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 164 N.E. 564, 249 N.Y. 511, 59 A.L.R. 1263, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 836 (N.Y. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Motion for reargument.

If we assume that the plaintiff was nearer the scene of the explosion than the prevailing opinion would suggest, she was not so near that injury from a falling package, not known to contain explosives, would be within the range of reasonable prevision.

The motion should be denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur; Crane, Andrews and O’Brien, JJ., concur in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martucci v. Tirro Construction Corp.
192 Misc. 2d 22 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
New York Telephone Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
99 A.D.2d 185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Nodine v. Terpening Trucking Co.
64 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hairston v. Broadwater
73 Misc. 2d 523 (New York Supreme Court, 1973)
Blunt v. Spears
92 S.E.2d 573 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 N.E. 564, 249 N.Y. 511, 59 A.L.R. 1263, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palsgraf-v-long-island-railroad-company-ny-1928.