Palomo v. Lewis

District Court, N.D. Texas·Decided July 16, 2025·No. 5:24-cv-00195·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION CRISANTO PALOMO, Plaintiff, No. 5:24-CV-00195-H BRADY LEWIS, et al., Defendants. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court made an independent examination of the record and reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s report for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate. The Court therefore orders that Plaintiff's complaint and all claims alleged within it are dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).! All relief not expressly granted and any pending motions are denied. The Court will enter judgment accordingly. So ordered. Dated July LG 2025.

United/States District Judge

! The Court notes that the dismissal may operate with prejudice by operation of the applicable statute of limitations. See Piotrowski v. City of Houston, 237 F.3d 567, 576 (Sth Cir. 2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palomo v. Lewis, (N.D. Tex. 2025).

Palomo v. Lewis (Palomo v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Piotrowski v. City of Houston
237 F.3d 567 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)