Palomino v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
This text of 504 So. 2d 445 (Palomino v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Ruby Palomino seeks reversal of the trial court’s order denying her motion to quash service by publication. The affidavit of Federal National Mortgage Association, plaintiff below, states, among other things, that “[d]efendant(s) have concealed themselves [sic] so that process can be personally served upon them [sic].... ” (Emphasis supplied.) Palomino contends that the affidavit was insufficient to support constructive service pursuant to sections 49.011(1), .021(1), .031-041, Florida Statutes (1985). We agree.
As a prerequisite to utilizing constructive service of process, plaintiff must establish the threshold requirement: inability to effectuate personal service. Taylor v. Lopez, 358 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); §§ 49.021(1), .041, Fla.Stat. (1985);1 see Bedford Computer Corp. v. Graphic Press, Inc., 484 So.2d 1225 (Fla.1986); see also Burton v. Burton, 448 So.2d 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (constructive service of process proper in dissolution of marriage action when personal service cannot be had); Shefer v. Shefer, 440 So.2d 1319 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (same). Statutes permitting constructive or substituted service of process are strictly construed, and plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating the validity of substituted service. Taylor; Callaghan v. Callaghan, 337 So.2d 986 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Fleischman v. Morris, 260 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); see Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith, 176 So.2d 903 (Fla.1965); Leviten v. Gaunt, 360 So.2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). In the case before us, plaintiff’s affidavit states that personal service can be effected; the affidavit is therefore facially insufficient to justify the use of constructive service. Thus the trial court did not acquire jurisdiction over Palomino.
Reversed and remanded with directions to quash service of process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
504 So. 2d 445, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 666, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palomino-v-federal-national-mortgage-assn-fladistctapp-1987.