Palomino-Agreda v. Mukasey
This text of 305 F. App'x 390 (Palomino-Agreda v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jorge Vincente Palomino-Agreda, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ [391]*391(“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of PalominoAgreda’s application for adjustment of status. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)©; Bazua-Cota v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 747, 748 (9th Cir.2006) (per curiam).
We also lack jurisdiction to consider Palomino-Agreda’s remaining contentions because he failed to exhaust them before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 F. App'x 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palomino-agreda-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.