Palomini v. Puglisi
91 A.D.3d 736, 936 N.Y.2d 568
Opinion
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellants’ motion pursuant to CPDR 3216 to dismiss the complaint as the plaintiff demonstrated a justifiable excuse for her delay in filing a note of issue, as well as the existence of a potentially meritorious cause of action (see Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 499, 503 [1997]; Kadyimov v [737] Mackinnon, 82 AD3d 938 [2011]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Eng, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Palomini v. Puglisi, 91 A.D.3d 736, 936 N.Y.2d 568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
91 A.D.3d 736 (Palomini v. Puglisi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baczkowski v. D.A. Collins Construction Co.
678 N.E.2d 460 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Kadyimov v. Mackinnon
82 A.D.3d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)