Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Palomini v. Puglisi

Palomini v. Puglisi

91 A.D.3d 736, 936 N.Y.2d 568
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 17, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.3d 736 (Palomini v. Puglisi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palomini v. Puglisi, 91 A.D.3d 736, 936 N.Y.2d 568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellants’ motion pursuant to CPDR 3216 to dismiss the complaint as the plaintiff demonstrated a justifiable excuse for her delay in filing a note of issue, as well as the existence of a potentially meritorious cause of action (see Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 499, 503 [1997]; Kadyimov v [737]*737Mackinnon, 82 AD3d 938 [2011]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Eng, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baczkowski v. D.A. Collins Construction Co.
678 N.E.2d 460 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Kadyimov v. Mackinnon
82 A.D.3d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.3d 736, 936 N.Y.2d 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palomini-v-puglisi-nyappdiv-2012.