Palmison v. First National Bank & Trust Co.

234 A.D. 797
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, as resettled, denying motion for examination of defendant before trial, [798] reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Examination to proceed at a time and place to be stated in the order. The points upon which plaintiffs desire to examine defendant appear to be for the purpose of controverting the defenses by avoidance, and not for the purpose of disclosing the defenses. Under such circumstances an examination may be had. (Schweinburg v. Altman, 131 App. Div. 795.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmison v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 234 A.D. 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

234 A.D. 797 (Palmison v. First National Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. Hollings-Smith Co.
242 A.D. 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Gramatan National Bank & Trust Co. v. Sagamore Apartments, Inc.
241 A.D. 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)