Palminteri v. Massapequa Shopping Associates

264 A.D.2d 412, 693 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8626
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 9, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated May 12, 1998, as granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

[413] The plaintiff Frieda Palminteri was allegedly injured when she tripped and fell on a small hole in the parking lot of a shopping center in Massapequa. Considering all the facts and circumstances of this case, including the dimensions and characteristics of the alleged defect, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them (see, Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976; Schechter v City of New York, 248 AD2d 372; Marinaccio v LeChambord Rest. 246 AD2d 514; Perrotta v Jamal, 245 AD2d 357).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Rit-ter, J. P., Thompson, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palminteri v. Massapequa Shopping Associates, 264 A.D.2d 412, 693 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

264 A.D.2d 412 (Palminteri v. Massapequa Shopping Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wasserman v. Genovese Drug Stores, Inc.
282 A.D.2d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)