Palmigiano v. Howard

278 A.2d 872, 108 R.I. 943, 1971 R.I. LEXIS 1505
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided July 16, 1971·No. M. P. No. 1494·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Respondent directed to file answer to petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, articulated by Supreme Court as a petition for the great writ, and therein to show cause, if any he has, why the writ should not issue as prayed, said answer to be limited to the following questions:

Nichalos A. Palmigiano, petitioner, pro se. Richard J. Israel, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.

(1) whether G. L. 1956, §11-7-4, charges a felony or a mis' demeanor, as raised by paragraph 1 of the petition;

(2) whether the imposition of a sentence to be served at the conclusion of a life sentence is ultra vires of the sentencing justice’s jurisdiction, as alleged in paragraph 2 of the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmigiano v. Howard, 278 A.2d 872, 108 R.I. 943, 1971 R.I. LEXIS 1505 (R.I. 1971).

278 A.2d 872 (Palmigiano v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guentter v. Borough of Lansdale
345 A.2d 306 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Wattman v. Wattman
288 A.2d 263 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1972)