Palmieri v. State
This text of 572 So. 2d 1378 (Palmieri v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Edward Michael PALMIERI, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jeffrey A. Blau of Jeffrey A. Blau, P.A., Tampa, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
McDONALD, Justice.
In State v. Palmieri, 558 So.2d 53 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), the district court expressly declared valid section 796.01, Florida Statutes (1987), the "house of ill fame" statute. In Warren v. State, 572 So.2d 1376 (Fla. 1991), however, we found section 796.01 unconstitutionally vague. Therefore, we quash Palmieri and remand to the district court to affirm the trial court's dismissal of the information.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
572 So. 2d 1378, 1991 WL 1342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmieri-v-state-fla-1991.