Palmetto Pump and Irrigation Company v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Florida

Fifth Circuit

Palmetto Pump and Irrigation Company v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Florida

313 F.2d 220, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 682, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6210

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 6, 1963·No. 19771·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued to recover income taxes paid which it alleged were erroneously and illegally assessed. The issue presented was what amounted to reasonable compensation for corporate officers under 26 U.S.C.A. § 162. This appeal is from the judgment entered on a jury verdict for appellee.

We are convinced from a careful review that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict, that no prejudicial error exists, and that the appeal is without merit. It follows that the judgment should be and is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued to recover income taxes paid which it alleged were erroneously and illegally assessed. The issue presented was what amounted to reasonable compensation for corporate officers under 26 U.S.C.A. § 162. This appeal is from the judgment entered on a jury verdict for appellee.

We are convinced from a careful review that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict, that no prejudicial error exists, and that the appeal is without merit. It follows that the judgment should be and is

Affirmed.

Palmetto Pump and Irrigation Company v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Florida, 313 F.2d 220, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 682, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6210 (5th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

313 F.2d 220 (Palmetto Pump and Irrigation Company v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related