Palmetto Citizens v. Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 19, 2012
Docket2012-UP-658
StatusUnpublished

This text of Palmetto Citizens v. Johnson (Palmetto Citizens v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palmetto Citizens v. Johnson, (S.C. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Palmetto Citizens Federal Credit Union, Respondent,

v.

Butch Johnson, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-184346

Appeal From Richland County J. Michelle Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-658 Submitted November 1, 2012 – Filed December 19, 2012

AFFIRMED

Butch Johnson, of Columbia, pro se.

Suzanne G. Grigg and Jennifer Joan Hollingsworth, both of Nexsen Pruet, LLC, of Columbia; and Kirsten Elena Small, of Nexsen Pruet, LLC, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Sundown Operating Co., Inc. v. Intedge Indus., Inc., 383 S.C. 601, 606, 681 S.E.2d 885, 888 (2009) ("The decision whether to set aside an entry of default or a default judgment lies solely within the sound discretion of the trial [court]."); id. ("The trial court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear showing of an abuse of that discretion."); id. ("An abuse of discretion occurs when the [court] issuing the order was controlled by some error of law or when the order, based upon factual, as distinguished from legal conclusions, is without evidentiary support."); S.C. Code Ann. § 15-9-740 (Supp. 2011) ("The order of publication shall direct the publication to be made in one newspaper . . . to be served and for such length of time as may be deemed reasonable not less than once a week for three weeks."); Tenney v. Am. Pipe Mfg. Co., 96 F. 919, 919-20 (1899) (holding service by publication is not complete until the expiration of the last week of publication); Rule 12(a), SCRCP ("A defendant shall serve his answer within 30 days after the service of the complaint upon him . . . ."); Rule 55(a), SCRCP ("When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules and that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter his default upon the calendar (file book).").

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sundown Operating Co. v. Intedge Industries, Inc.
681 S.E.2d 885 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2009)
Tenney v. American Pipe Mfg. Co.
96 F. 919 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Palmetto Citizens v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmetto-citizens-v-johnson-scctapp-2012.