Palmer v. Uplift Publishing Co.
100 A. 973, 256 Pa. 370, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 618
This text of 100 A. 973 (Palmer v. Uplift Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Palmer v. Uplift Publishing Co., 100 A. 973, 256 Pa. 370, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 618 (Pa. 1917).
Opinion
We think the facts averred in the affidavit of defense are sufficient to send the case to a jury, and, therefore, the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense was properly discharged.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 A. 973, 256 Pa. 370, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-uplift-publishing-co-pa-1917.