Palmer v. Tucker

45 Me. 316
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 45 Me. 316 (Palmer v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palmer v. Tucker, 45 Me. 316 (Me. 1858).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was announced by

May, J.

In view of the facts contained in the petition, as modified and assented to in the agreed statement of facts, the Court, (authorized to draw such inferences as a jury might,) are of opinion that the petitioner had a lien, as is claimed by him, which he has neither abandoned nor waived by any proceeding on his part. In addition to authorities cited by his counsel, see also Danforth v. Pratt, 42 Maine, 50.

Tenney, C. J., Cutting, Goodenow, and Davis, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eugene Barry & Sons v. Stone
5 F.2d 769 (First Circuit, 1925)
Quist v. Sandman
99 P. 204 (California Supreme Court, 1908)
Bennett Bros. Lumber Co. v. Robinson
159 F. 910 (Sixth Circuit, 1908)
Haughton v. Busch
59 N.W. 621 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Oxford Iron Co.
33 N.J. Eq. 192 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Me. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-tucker-me-1858.