Palmer v. Tucker

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Palmer v. Tucker

45 Me. 316

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was announced by

May, J.

In view of the facts contained in the petition, as modified and assented to in the agreed statement of facts, the Court, (authorized to draw such inferences as a jury might,) are of opinion that the petitioner had a lien, as is claimed by him, which he has neither abandoned nor waived by any proceeding on his part. In addition to authorities cited by his counsel, see also Danforth v. Pratt, 42 Maine, 50.

Tenney, C. J., Cutting, Goodenow, and Davis, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was announced by

May, J.

In view of the facts contained in the petition, as modified and assented to in the agreed statement of facts, the Court, (authorized to draw such inferences as a jury might,) are of opinion that the petitioner had a lien, as is claimed by him, which he has neither abandoned nor waived by any proceeding on his part. In addition to authorities cited by his counsel, see also Danforth v. Pratt, 42 Maine, 50.

Tenney, C. J., Cutting, Goodenow, and Davis, J. J., concurred.

Palmer v. Tucker, 45 Me. 316 (Me. 1858).

Pincite

45 Me. 316 (Palmer v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related