Palmer v. Tam

2 Del. Cas. 570
CourtOrphan's Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 21, 1820
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Del. Cas. 570 (Palmer v. Tam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Orphan's Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palmer v. Tam, 2 Del. Cas. 570 (Del. Ct. App. 1820).

Opinion

Petition dismissed, the petitioner not making any proof whatever, and although warned at March Term, 1820, and at last July Term, of the necessity of bringing proof to show that Joseph Tam was seised of land during the marriage and death. He never produced a title of evidence to prove any title to Tam in the land. Indeed he never had examined, or made the last preparation. I think it is probable that the widow was entitled to' dower in some land or mills; but it is to be doubted whether the sawmill, on which he seemed to rely, was situate on any of the land included in the petition. He had no counsel, neither now, nor twice before when this case was agitated in court. The Court took great pains heretofore to impress on his mind the necessity of preparation for the investigation, but without effect..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Del. Cas. 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-tam-delorphct-1820.