Palmer v. State

437 S.E.2d 490, 210 Ga. App. 717, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 3997, 1993 Ga. App. LEXIS 1331
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 1, 1993
DocketA93A1550
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 437 S.E.2d 490 (Palmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palmer v. State, 437 S.E.2d 490, 210 Ga. App. 717, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 3997, 1993 Ga. App. LEXIS 1331 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Pope, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Because he was previously convicted of selling cocaine, he was sentenced to life pursuant to OCGA § 16-13-30 (d).

In his sole enumeration of error, defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to establish his intent to distribute. The evidence *718 showed that defendant was in possession of nine rocks of crack cocaine and was not in possession of any smoking device. And, contrary to defendant’s claim that he was smoking the crack and intended to smoke all the rocks himself, two officers testified that defendant did not appear to be under the influence of cocaine at the time of his arrest. Moreover, the State produced an expert in the field of narcotics investigation who opined that someone with that amount of crack cocaine broken up into rocks of that size had it for the purpose of distributing it. See Davis v. State, 200 Ga. App. 44 (2) (406 SE2d 555) (1991). Viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, this evidence was sufficient to allow a rational jury to find defendant guilty of possession with intent to distribute beyond a reasonable doubt. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

Decided November 1, 1993. Hal T. Peel, for appellant. Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, John T. Durden, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. State
671 S.E.2d 860 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Hicks v. State
668 S.E.2d 474 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Griffin v. State
662 S.E.2d 171 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Huynh v. State
518 S.E.2d 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Taylor v. State
509 S.E.2d 388 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Haynes v. State
495 S.E.2d 591 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Thomas v. State
474 S.E.2d 631 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Dyer v. State
463 S.E.2d 718 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
In the Interest of D. S.
453 S.E.2d 114 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Anderson v. State
451 S.E.2d 103 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
437 S.E.2d 490, 210 Ga. App. 717, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 3997, 1993 Ga. App. LEXIS 1331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-state-gactapp-1993.