Palmer v. ST. ANTHONY'S MEDICAL CENTER
This text of 262 S.W.3d 678 (Palmer v. ST. ANTHONY'S MEDICAL CENTER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 S.W.3d 678, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1221, 2008 WL 4133940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-st-anthonys-medical-center-moctapp-2008.