Palmer v. Smith
This text of 9 Rob. 401 (Palmer v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A re-hearirig was granted to the plaintiffs, who [402]*402were anxious to obtain a judgment against the defendants, that the case should be remanded to the District Court, or one of non-suit only. After a new and laborious investigation of the arguments theretofore adduced, the application for a re-hearing, and the written arguments thereto added, we have risen from the examination of the law and facts of this case, with the impression that our former judgment should not be disturbed, but carried into execution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Rob. 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-smith-la-1845.