Palmer v. Searle

D.C. Circuit

Palmer v. Searle

226 F.2d 781, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 417

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 3, 1955

DocketNos. 12657, 12658

StatusPublished

This text of 226 F.2d 781 (Palmer v. Searle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palmer v. Searle, 226 F.2d 781, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 417 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was plaintiff in two civil actions for damages, one against the driver and the other against the owner of an automobile which was in collision with plaintiff’s car. The trial court, hearing the case without a jury, made findings of fact and conclusions of law favorable to the defendants, for whom judgment was thereupon entered.

We are not at liberty to set aside findings of fact of the trial court unless they are clearly erroneous¹; and since, in our opinion, the findings in this case are not clearly erroneous, the judgment must be and is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was plaintiff in two civil actions for damages, one against the driver and the other against the owner of an automobile which was in collision with plaintiff’s car. The trial court, hearing the case without a jury, made findings of fact and conclusions of law favorable to the defendants, for whom judgment was thereupon entered.

We are not at liberty to set aside findings of fact of the trial court unless they are clearly erroneous¹; and since, in our opinion, the findings in this case are not clearly erroneous, the judgment must be and is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 F.2d 781, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-searle-cadc-1955.