Palmer v. Salisbury

38 A.D. 139, 56 N.Y.S. 637
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 A.D. 139 (Palmer v. Salisbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palmer v. Salisbury, 38 A.D. 139, 56 N.Y.S. 637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

Rumsey, J. :

There can be no doubt that the court had power in the .proper case to allow the amendment to the complaint, but the rule is, almost without exception, that whenever a complaint has been amended it is necessary that a copy of it should be served upon the defendant, and that he should have an opportunity to answer it, if .he desires. The fact that he has defaulted in answering the original [140]*140complaint is of no importance. It may well be that he did not choose to answer the original complaint, but that he might desire to put in issue the facts which the plaintiff finds it necessary to allege by the amendment. The order, therefore, was erroneous in permitting the amendment of this complaint without giving the defendant an. opportunity to answer. '

For this reason the order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to a motion on the part of the plaintiff, upon payment of above costs, to set aside the judgment and serve an amended complaint, if he shall be so advised.

Van Brunt, P. J., Barrett, Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to a motion by plaintiff, on payment of such costs, to set aside judgment and serve an amended, complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merrill v. Thompson
80 A.D. 503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D. 139, 56 N.Y.S. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-salisbury-nyappdiv-1899.