Palmer v. Safft

The Superior Court of New York City

Palmer v. Safft

24 Jones & S. 594

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided January 7, 1889·Published

Opinion

The Court (Ingraham, J., writing)

held “ as set forth in the head note, citing Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 365-372; Page v. Waring, 103 AT". Y. 636; and held that there was sufficient evidence of the facts constituting [595] adverse possession to carry the case to the jury; and therefore sustained defendant’s exceptions and ordered a new trial.”

Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J. concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court (Ingraham, J., writing)

held “ as set forth in the head note, citing Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 365-372; Page v. Waring, 103 AT". Y. 636; and held that there was sufficient evidence of the facts constituting [595] adverse possession to carry the case to the jury; and therefore sustained defendant’s exceptions and ordered a new trial.”

Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J. concurred.

Palmer v. Safft, 24 Jones & S. 594 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

24 Jones & S. 594 (Palmer v. Safft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.