Palmer v. Rotary Realty Co.
Opinion
The orders herein entered in the office of the clerk of Kings county on May 27, 1929, and on June 21, 1929, are reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion of plaintiff Rose M. Palmer dated May 7, 1929, for an accounting by Louis Levin as receiver, and the motion of said plaintiff dated May 23, 1929, for an order setting aside the order dated July 20, 1928, settling the account of said receiver and terminating his receivership, are granted, with ten dollars costs on each motion. It appears on the face of the original papers that the notice of motion to settle the account of the receiver was dated May 29, 1928, and was made returnable June 6, 1928, and that it purports to have been served upon Rose M. Palmer by mail by depositing the same on June 1, 1928, in a United States post office box in Brooklyn, addressed to said Rose M. Palmer at 501 Gates [765] avenue, Brooklyn, as appears by the original affidavit of service. This service by mail did not conform to the requirements of rule 60 of the Buies of Civil Practice and section 164 of the Civil Practice Act.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
233 A.D. 764 (Palmer v. Rotary Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.