Palmer v. Ranken

New York Supreme Court

Palmer v. Ranken

56 How. Pr. 354

DecidedNovember 15, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 56 How. Pr. 354 (Palmer v. Ranken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palmer v. Ranken, 56 How. Pr. 354 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

decided that the judgment must be affirmed, as it could not tell, from the report, whether costs had been properly allowed unless the evidence was presented, and that the propriety of granting such costs depends upon the evidence and not upon the facts found or the decision given. The plaintiff’s counsel then asked for liberty to present the case, and it was granted upon payment of ten dollars costs and the cause put over the term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

decided that the judgment must be affirmed, as it could not tell, from the report, whether costs had been properly allowed unless the evidence was presented, and that the propriety of granting such costs depends upon the evidence and not upon the facts found or the decision given. The plaintiff’s counsel then asked for liberty to present the case, and it was granted upon payment of ten dollars costs and the cause put over the term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 How. Pr. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-ranken-nysupct-1878.