Palmer v. Popelston.

8 N.C. 307
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1821
StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.C. 307 (Palmer v. Popelston.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palmer v. Popelston., 8 N.C. 307 (N.C. 1821).

Opinion

Tayxor, Chief-Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The act of 1792 requires all written transfers or conveyances of slaves to be registered in the county where the purchaser resides, provided he be in the actual possession of the slave. It makes no distinction between a Sheriff’s bill of sale and any other; and therefore, where the title is set up under such an one, there can be no *309 doubt that the requisites of the law must be complied with. Hence the nonsuit was properly awarded: but as the objection was not taken on the former trial, the Plaintiff was surprised by it. The justice of the case, therefore, renders it fit that a new trial should be awarded, and this is done upon payment of the costs of tills and the Superior Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 N.C. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-popelston-nc-1821.