Palmer v. Phenix Insurance
29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 224
Opinion
We are of opinion that under section 1023 of the new Code, and other sections touching, the subject, a judge or referee cannot be required, or permitted, to make additional findings of fact or law, upon the settlement of the case, after his report or decision has been rendered. So far as Rule 32 conflicts with this section it is inoperative.
Order affirmed, with $10 costs, and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Palmer v. Phenix Insurance, 29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 224 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).
29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 224 (Palmer v. Phenix Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.