Palmer v. People
10 Wend. 165
Opinion
By the Court,
There is no doubt a man may be guilty of larceny in stealing his own property, when done with intent to charge another person with the value of it. 2 East’s Cr. L. 558, § 7. 1 Hawkins, ch. 33, § 30. The constable, by levying on the shingles, had acquired a special property in them, 7 Cowen, 297; 6 Johns. R. 196; and the charge was well laid by stating the property to be in the constable, 8 Cowen, 137. 14 Mass. R. 217. The evidence fully warranted the conviction, and the judgment of the court of special sessions must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Palmer v. People, 10 Wend. 165 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1833).
10 Wend. 165 (Palmer v. People) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Kambeitz
256 F. 247 (N.D. New York, 1919)
People v. Arnstein
28 N.Y. Crim. 165 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1912)
Pickens v. Coal River Boom Co.
65 S.E. 865 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1909)
Commonwealth v. Dingman
26 Pa. Super. 615 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
Bruley v. Rose
11 N.W. 629 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1882)
Taylor v. State
7 Tex. Ct. App. 659 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1880)
Hall v. Adkins
59 Mo. 144 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1875)
Commonwealth v. Greene
111 Mass. 392 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)
Miller v. Adsit
16 Wend. 335 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1836)