Palmer v. Pennington
This text of 175 S.E. 380 (Palmer v. Pennington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. “ One in possession of land under a bond for titles from tbe true owner, witli purchase-money partly paid, is the owner of the freehold relatively to all persons except the maker of the bond and those claiming under him.” Fulton County v. Amorous, 89 Ga. 614 (3) (16 S. E. 201); Rosette v. Shelton, 159 Ga. 422 (126 S. E. 242). That principle was applicable in the case.
2. The ruling made in the first headnote controls all of the issues raised in the petition for certiorari. Other issues decided by the Court of Appeals, not controlled by the ruling made in the first headnote, are not raised in the petition for certiorari, and consequently not mentioned by this court. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further action not inconsistent herewith.
Judgment reversed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 S.E. 380, 179 Ga. 76, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-pennington-ga-1934.