Palmer v. Mulligan
2 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 360
This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 95 (Palmer v. Mulligan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Palmer v. Mulligan, 2 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 360 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).
Opinion
You are entitled to costs, but as there is a sufficient reason for not proceeding to trial, we shall not oblige tbe plaintiffs to stipulate.
I think they ought to stipulate. There ia a verdict in favor of the defendants, which, till the contrary is shown, we ought to think correctly given.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-mulligan-nysupct-1804.