Palmer v. Mulligan

2 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 360
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Palmer v. Mulligan. Read the opinion of the Court — 3 Cai. Cas. 307
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1804·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,.

You are entitled to costs, but as there is a sufficient reason for not proceeding to trial, we shall not oblige tbe plaintiffs to stipulate.

Spencer, J.

I think they ought to stipulate. There ia a verdict in favor of the defendants, which, till the contrary is shown, we ought to think correctly given.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmer v. Mulligan, 2 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 360 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).

2 Cai. Cas. 95 (Palmer v. Mulligan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.