Palmer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Palmer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

21 Mo. App. 437, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 199

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 5, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 21 Mo. App. 437 (Palmer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palmer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co., 21 Mo. App. 437, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 199 (Mo. Ct. App. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Ellison, J.

— This action was begun before a justice-of the peace of Sedalia township, for killing plaintiff ’ s-hogs in Smithton township, alleged to be adjoining Sedalia. It is for double damages, under section 809, Revised Statutes. The plaintiff failed to prove the killing-was done in Smithton township, or that that township, adjoined Sedalia, as is alleged in his complaint. Backenstoe v. Ry. Co., decided by this court July 6, 1855.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded..

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellison, J.

— This action was begun before a justice-of the peace of Sedalia township, for killing plaintiff ’ s-hogs in Smithton township, alleged to be adjoining Sedalia. It is for double damages, under section 809, Revised Statutes. The plaintiff failed to prove the killing-was done in Smithton township, or that that township, adjoined Sedalia, as is alleged in his complaint. Backenstoe v. Ry. Co., decided by this court July 6, 1855.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded..

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Mo. App. 437, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-missouri-pacific-railway-co-moctapp-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack