Palmer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Palmer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

21 Mo. App. 437, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 199

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 5, 1886·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Ellison, J.

— This action was begun before a justice-of the peace of Sedalia township, for killing plaintiff ’ s-hogs in Smithton township, alleged to be adjoining Sedalia. It is for double damages, under section 809, Revised Statutes. The plaintiff failed to prove the killing-was done in Smithton township, or that that township, adjoined Sedalia, as is alleged in his complaint. Backenstoe v. Ry. Co., decided by this court July 6, 1855.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded..

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellison, J.

— This action was begun before a justice-of the peace of Sedalia township, for killing plaintiff ’ s-hogs in Smithton township, alleged to be adjoining Sedalia. It is for double damages, under section 809, Revised Statutes. The plaintiff failed to prove the killing-was done in Smithton township, or that that township, adjoined Sedalia, as is alleged in his complaint. Backenstoe v. Ry. Co., decided by this court July 6, 1855.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded..

All concur.

Palmer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co., 21 Mo. App. 437, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 199 (Mo. Ct. App. 1886).

Pincite

21 Mo. App. 437 (Palmer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related